Search this site

Entries in Wireless Sensor Networks (5)

Wednesday
13Jan2010

IP based wireless adopted for data center sensors

Here's another example of using wireless sensor networks to easily implement data gathering. IBM's Systems Director Active Energy Manager (AEM) will support Arch Rock's PhyNet IP (Internet protocol)-based wireless sensor network technology to monitor and manage energy usage in corporate data centers. The integrated products, now available, will transmit a set of power and thermal data gathered by strategically-placed Arch Rock wireless sensors. The data will be displayed on the AEM Web interface, presenting users with a comprehensive view of their data centers' energy consumption and environmental health.

Arch Rock's IP-based PhyNet platform implements a tiered, scalable wireless sensor network architecture that includes what Arch Rock calls "the first WSN router," interconnecting IETF 6LoWPAN wireless mesh networks with IPv4 or IPv6 enterprise networks.


Thursday
03Dec2009

Getting Wireless Together

I knew it would happen, and here it is already. While some moan about the fact that ISA rejected the existing WirelessHart standard as it adopted its ISA100.11a standard (still awaiting ANSI acceptance the last I heard), I knew that this was just an opportunity for networking companies to build interoperable devices that would help end users implement the systems they wanted.

So, Apprion has announced a new version of its IONizer industrial wireless networking appliance that seamlessly integrates wireless sensor network gateways based on either ISA100.11a or WirelessHart standards with 802.11 (WiFi) radios to support other industrial wireless applications such as mobility, location, video, and communications and to enable efficient backhaul of sensor data wirelessly.

"Without standards like ISA100 and WirelessHart, creating scalable applications based on wireless sensor networks would create islands of automation that would never deliver their full potential value," said Doug Donzelli, Apprion's President and CEO. “The only way wireless applications get traction in the industrial world is through the adoption of appropriate standards and the integration of those standards through platforms like our ION System that allow these wireless sensor networks to deliver data to the full range of operational, safety, and security applications."

As Apprion describes its system: IONizers supporting ISA100 and WirelessHart wireless sensor networks are integrated with the Apprion IONosphere as part of Apprion’s ION System. This integration allows transmission of real-time sensor data from devices instrumented with ISA100 or WirelessHart sensors to the ION Condition Monitoring application. Combine the ION Condition Monitoring application with other ION applications such as ION Video and/or ION Asset Tracking to create operational dashboards customized to each individual’s role in the plant. Integrate ION Applications with other applications to provide manufacturing facilities with a single, customizable interface that uniquely meets the application requirements for safety, security, engineering, logistics, and maintenance personnel.

As the two wireless sensor networks gain traction, expect other suppliers to release products designed to get them to work together at some level.

Tuesday
17Nov2009

NAMUR Confirms WirelessHart

NAMUR, an international user association of 121 member companies in the chemical/pharmaceutical processing industry, confirms that WirelessHart technology meets the requirements for wireless sensor networks in process applications. After conducting an extensive multi-vendor field test, NAMUR reports that WirelessHart Communication provides the flexibility, security, robust performance, coexistence with other radio technologies and device interoperability within a WirelessHART network that its members should expect.

The NAMUR field test used WirelessHart products from ABB, Emerson Process Management, Endress+Hauser, MACTek, Pepperl+Fuchs and Siemens to evaluate and verify WirelessHart compliance with NAMUR Recommendation NE124, "Requirements for Wireless Automation" and NAMUR Working Document NA115, "IT Security for Process Automation Systems." The field test conducted at the BASF facility in Ludwigshafen, Germany, included laboratory evaluation of performance characteristics and several implementations in operating process plant environments.

"Our tests prove that WirelessHart is an appropriate technology for applications within the NAMUR use class 'Monitoring' for wireless sensor networks," reports Martin Schwibach, Senior Automation Manager for BASF and Chairman of the NAMUR AK4.15 Wireless Automation Working Group responsible for the field test. "WirelessHart technology provides a good alternative where wired networks are too expensive or too difficult to install. This field test verified the alignment of the WirelessHart standard with the NAMUR requirements for wireless automation in process applications."

"We are delighted that the NAMUR field test showed WirelessHart meets user needs," says Hart Communication Foundation Executive Director Ron Helson. "Other user installations have also proven the capabilities of WirelessHart, a technology designed specifically for process applications that builds on experience gained with millions of wired Hart devices installed around the world. We look forward to working with NAMUR and others to continue improving the technology and extend its benefits to even more users worldwide."

Tuesday
06Oct2009

ISA Wireless Works

It was a good, if difficult, decision to switch to an earlier flight yesterday and go on a plant tour of the Arkema chemical plant in Crosby, Texas to see the first implementation of ISA100.11a wireless sensor network technology. Guess what? It works. Within two weeks of the adoption of the new standard, four companies put together production-ready products and the local integrator was able to have it installed and operational.

Honeywell, Yokogawa, Gastronics and Nivis combined to supply products that included wireless level sensing, temperature sensing, gas sensing and limit switch with information brought through a wireless gateway into a Honeywell DCS and Nivis network management tool.

Plant Manager Didier Auber pointed out that the reason they started evaluating wireless was a remote tank that holds water for the fire extinguishing system. Someone had to periodically go out to the site, read the level gauge, record the result and then go back and enter the information. The cost of running signal cable out to the tank was prohibitive. Enter wireless. Now operators can get continuous readings directly from the sensor. Alarms can be added to the DCS system. After this decision was reached, it became logical to look for other remote monitoring that could be easily installed and yield similar benefits.

I used the term "production-ready" because the engineering work to put wireless on instruments can be completed more quickly than gaining all the requisite regulatory approvals. True production components are expected first quarter of next year.

So, yes, ISA100.11a wireless is real. Underlying technology is available. Production parts, tested by the Wireless Compliance Institute of the ISA for compliance, are expected for end user installation early next year.

Wednesday
16Sep2009

Let the wireless battle begin

I've chased the drama of wireless sensor networks for around three years, now. CEOs have expressed the opinion that this technology is a game changer in process control. (Note, I'm on record for agreeing.) There have been contentious standards committee meetings that sometimes have spilled over from the "smoke-filled rooms" to public discourse. Suppliers have lined up behind technologies. Charges have been leveled. Now, the dust has settled (oops, didn't mean a pun there).

This reminds me of one of my favorite poets, T.S. Eliot, who wrote in "The Hollow Men"

This is the way the world ends,
This is the way the world ends,
This is the way the world ends,
Not with a bang, but a whimper


In an almost anti-climatic press release, we learn that ISA (the International Society of Automation) has approved the long-suffering ISA 100.11a standard for "Wireless Systems for Industrial Automation: Process Control and Related Applications." In a later press release, we learn, not surprisingly, that the leaders of the Compliance Institute which will certify products for compliance, are from Honeywell Process Systems and Yokogawa Corp.

The amazing thing is that the committee decided not to write a functional or performance specification, but instead it picked technology winners. Rather than going with the protocol stack developed by Dust Networks--the basis for WirelessHart--which has been opened for competitors, it has endorsed the protocol stack/firmware from one different, specific vendor. The short version is -- there are two standards for suppliers and their customers to choose from. In this horse race, WirelessHart, promulgated by the Hart Communication Foundation, has a big head start. Although Honeywell is showing off a working ISA100.11a system to the press on the day before the annual ISA Expo in Houston October 5. Unfortunately, I've already booked airline tickets. Not wanting to waste a day in Houston, I'm arriving in the evening. So, I'll miss the tour (in this economy, I can't afford the airline charge to change tickets).

I'm going to float an idea. Tell me if I'm off base (more than usual). I think there is an analog between this situation and the fieldbus situation of about 10 years ago. With much wailing and gnashing of teeth back then, industry vendors settled on two standards (for discrete)--DeviceNet and Profibus. Did this destroy the industry? Hardly. The competition has been good as each has subsequently developed and extended its technology in different ways. Third-party companies have developed gateways. Users typically picked the network of its dominant automation supplier and then linked as necessary. The companies perhaps hurt the most are the smaller instrument suppliers who must support different technologies. Heck, the competition has even propelled the CC-Link people to open its specification from proprietary to open standard status.

I'm told that the main point of contention was that the eventual ISA winners believed that the WirelessHart solution was not robust enough for control. (Shhh, don't tell the engineers who are already doing it.)

The key isn't just in the wireless, anyway. It's how you use it. I believe it requires integrating field device information into a middleware software application, such as an MES, where analytics are performed and business intelligence is developed. So the race really has just begun. Let the market decide.