<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:46:19 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Feed Forward</title><subtitle>Feed Forward</subtitle><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/atom.xml"/><updated>2010-07-29T11:08:25Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v5.11.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Manufacturings Importance to Enterprises</title><category term="Automation"/><category term="Manufacturing"/><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/29/manufacturings-importance-to-enterprises.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/29/manufacturings-importance-to-enterprises.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-29T11:02:51Z</published><updated>2010-07-29T11:02:51Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I am working on an article on manufacturing's importance to the enterprise. I'm interested in what your experience has been as you have led or defended manufacturing's role in the overall company. Where do you see manufacturing as strategic to the success of a company? How? How do you explain it? What can we do to assure that manufacturing plays a crucial role?</p>
<p>You can reply here or send an email. gmintchell@automationworld.com Thanks for your insights.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Experts Weigh In on Stuxnet and Siemens</title><category term="Automation"/><category term="Security"/><category term="Siemens"/><category term="Stuxnet"/><category term="security"/><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/29/experts-weigh-in-on-stuxnet-and-siemens.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/29/experts-weigh-in-on-stuxnet-and-siemens.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-29T10:57:34Z</published><updated>2010-07-29T10:57:34Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>A panel of experts on cyber security met virtually on the Web for a panel discussion on the Stuxnet worm attack on Siemens WinCC on Tuesday. It was enlightening. Wes Iversen at <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.automationworld.com/news-7345">Automation World has a report</a></strong></em></span> on the discussion. The program is archived for later viewing. You can register to <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.industrialdefender.com/reg/downloads_register.php">view it here</a></strong></em></span>.</p>
<p>Moderator: <br /><br />Patrick Miller <br />Technical Director, NERC CIP Practice <br />ICF International <br />millerpatrick.c@gmail.com <br /><br />Panelists: <br /><br />Eric Byres <br />Co-founder and Chief Technology Officer <br />Byres Security Inc. <br />eric@byressecurity.com <br /><br />Andrew Ginter <br />Chief Technology Officer <br />Industrial Defender <br />aginter@industrialdefender.com <br /><br />Dale Peterson <br />Founder and Director of the Control System Security Practice <br />Digital Bond, Inc. <br />peterson@digitalbond.com <br /><br />Mark Zanotti <br />Vice President of Engineering and CTO <br />Lofty Perch, Inc. <br />mzanotti@loftyperch.com</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Expert Panel Discusses Stuxnet Worm - Siemens WinCC</title><category term="Automation"/><category term="Security"/><category term="Siemens"/><category term="security"/><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/26/expert-panel-discusses-stuxnet-worm-siemens-wincc.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/26/expert-panel-discusses-stuxnet-worm-siemens-wincc.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-26T19:36:32Z</published><updated>2010-07-26T19:36:32Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I just received an email about a <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/779249264">Panel Discussion Webinar</a></strong></em></span>, "The Stuxnet Worm: Reality check for automation system security." I've interviewed both Eric Byres and Andrew Ginter, so I'm sure that there will be good information.</p>
<p>The promo copy reads, "Industry experts cut through the noise to analyze the impact of the reported malware targeting Siemens Simatic WinCC SCADA systems and the implications for Industrial Control Systems operators, vendors and security providers."</p>
<p>When: Tuesday July 27th, 11 am - 12 noon eastern time</p>
<p>Moderator: Patrick C. Miller - ICF International</p>
<p>Panelists:<br />Eric Byres - Tofino <br />Andrew Ginter - Industrial Defender <br />Dale Peterson - Digital Bond <br />Mark Zanotti - Lofty Perch﻿</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Audio Essay on Security, Safety and At Risk Behavior</title><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/25/audio-essay-on-security-safety-and-at-risk-behavior.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/25/audio-essay-on-security-safety-and-at-risk-behavior.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-25T18:27:42Z</published><updated>2010-07-25T18:27:42Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>If you prefer to download audio, here's that version of my essay taking off on the BP safety oil rig situation and the worm that attacked Siemens' HMI/SCADA.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Video Essay on Security, Safety, At Risk Behavior</title><category term="Automation"/><category term="Safety"/><category term="security"/><category term="video"/><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/25/video-essay-on-security-safety-at-risk-behavior.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/25/video-essay-on-security-safety-at-risk-behavior.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-25T18:24:30Z</published><updated>2010-07-25T18:24:30Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Here is my latest video essay taking off from the BP oil rig safety disaster and the worm that attacked Siemens' HMI/SCADA software.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gqZYgujGmHo&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gqZYgujGmHo&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Automation, Productivity and Manufacturing Jobs</title><category term="Automation"/><category term="Jobs"/><category term="Manufacturing"/><category term="Packaging"/><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/25/automation-productivity-and-manufacturing-jobs.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/25/automation-productivity-and-manufacturing-jobs.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-25T18:21:55Z</published><updated>2010-07-25T18:21:55Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Retired packaging engineer and OMAC leader, Keith Campbell, has returned from his sailing vacation to post a couple of comments about packaging.</p>
<p>First, he predicts that <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.ontheedgeblog.com/blog-mt1/2010/07/good_times_ahead_for_packaging.php">good times are ahead for packaging machinery</a></strong></em></span>. Why, especially in this still stagnant economy? "Because the only way to increase earnings on weak sales is through gains in productivity."</p>
<p>Then he notes that the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.ontheedgeblog.com/blog-mt1/2010/07/the_bar_is_being_raised.php">bar for entry level workers in manufacturing</a></strong></em></span> continues to be raised. He received a call asking if he knew where to find graduating students from a mechatronics education program to fill entry level operator positions.</p>
<p>Yes, Keith is right, there. The era of unskilled people earning middle-class incomes (if such a thing exists in today's America) in manufacturing is long over. If you're unskilled, you can find some jobs in manufacturing. But the pay will be just above minimum wage--and you'll probably be a temporary worker. Manufacturing jobs that pay a reasonable wage will require education, training and skills.</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Why Geeks Love Inception</title><category term="Inception"/><category term="Movies"/><category term="Observations"/><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/24/why-geeks-love-inception.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/24/why-geeks-love-inception.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-24T19:33:03Z</published><updated>2010-07-24T19:33:03Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>I just saw this essay--<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/07/24/7-reasons-why-techies-love-inception/">Seven Reasons Why Techies Love Inception</a></strong></em></span> (the movie, of course). I saw it last week. Even though I'm not a Leonardo fan, I loved the movie. For all the seven reasons--especially number two ;-)</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Automation Conference Second Season</title><category term="Automation"/><category term="Conferences"/><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/24/automation-conference-second-season.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/24/automation-conference-second-season.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-24T15:29:10Z</published><updated>2010-07-24T15:29:10Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>The late summer and fall conference season is about to take off (I'd say heat up, but it's been almost as hot in Ohio as in Austin, where I'll be in 10 days). If any of these appeal to you, there is still time to register. See you there. Don't forget to shout out if you see me.</p>
<p>The first week in August feature National Instruments' <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.ni.com/niweek/">NI Week</a></strong></em></span>. Also that week is the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.us.profibus.com/">PTO annual general meeting</a></strong></em></span>. I'll be in Austin with NI. Automation World's digital managing editor Grant Gerke will be covering the US Profibus event in Phoenix.</p>
<p>This year appears to be a little slender in events. The next one I'll be at is <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.emersonexchange.org">Emerson Exchange</a></strong></em></span>, this year in San Antonio, Sept. 27-Oct. 1.</p>
<p>Then is mid-October (18-20) is the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://iom.invensys.com/EN/Pages/OpsManage10.aspx">Invensys Ops Manage Conference</a></strong></em></span> in Orlando.</p>
<p>The first week of November features duelling events. I'll be in Orlando at Rockwell Automation's <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.rockwellautomation.com/events/automationfair/psug.html">Process Systems User Group</a></strong></em></span> Nov. 1-2 and <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.rockwellautomation.com/events/automationfair/">Automation Fair</a></strong></em></span> Nov. 3-4. Meanwhile Managing Editor Wes Iversen and the rest of the staff will be at Chicago's McCormick Place at <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.packexpo.com/pei2010/public/enter.aspx">Pack Expo</a></strong></em></span>.<br /><br /><br /><br />﻿</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Another Milestone for WirelessHart</title><category term="Automation"/><category term="Networking"/><category term="Standards"/><category term="Wireless"/><category term="Wireless Sensor Networks"/><category term="WirelessHart"/><category term="networking"/><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/23/another-milestone-for-wirelesshart.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/23/another-milestone-for-wirelesshart.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-23T21:02:01Z</published><updated>2010-07-23T21:02:01Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>The <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.hartcomm.org/">Hart Communication Foundation</a></strong></em></span> has announced that the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) has approved the WirelessHart specification as a European National Standard (EN 62591). CEN released the standard to CENELEC, the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, whose members are the national electrotechnical committees of 31 European countries. CENELEC approved the WirelessHART European Standard on 01 June 2010.</p>
<p>&ldquo;In March, the WirelessHart specification was approved by the International Electrotechnical Commission as a full international standard (IEC 62591Ed. 1.0),&rdquo; says Ron Helson, Executive Director of the Hart Communication Foundation. &ldquo;Approval as a European National Standard further confirms acceptance of the technology by users and suppliers as a technically sound, reliable and secure solution for wireless communication in process automation.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The IEC Standard was approved by CENELEC as a European Standard without any modification. According to the announcement of approval issued by CENELEC, &ldquo;members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration&rdquo;.</p>
<p>A growing number of WirelessHart compatible products are available today from major global suppliers including ABB, Emerson, Endress+Hauser, MACTek, Nivis, Phoenix Contact, Pepperl+Fuchs, Siemens and others.</p>
<p>Released in September 2007, WirelessHart is an open and interoperable wireless communication standard designed to address the critical needs of industry for reliable, robust and secure wireless communication in real-time industrial process measurement and control applications.</p>
<p>WirelessHart is a backward compatible, evolutionary enhancement to the Hart Communication Protocol, the leading communication technology for intelligent process measurement and control field devices and systems with more than 30 million devices installed and operating in process plant applications around the globe.</p>
<p>The CEN was founded in 1961. Its 30 national members work together to develop European Standards (ENs) in various sectors to build a European internal market for goods and services and to position Europe in the global economy. CENELEC is a non-profit technical organization set up under Belgian law. CENELEC members have been working together in the interests of European harmonization since the 1950s, creating both standards requested by the market and harmonized standards in support of European legislation.</p>
<p>The Hart Communication Foundation is an independent, not-for-profit membership organization that provides global support for the application of Hart technology. The Foundation is the technology owner, standards setting body and central authority on the Hart Communication Protocol, establishing and controlling new technology developments and enhancements that support the needs of the process automation industry. Founded in 1993, Foundation membership includes more than 230 companies worldwide.﻿</p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Safety and Security in Automation</title><category term="Automation"/><category term="Safety"/><category term="security"/><id>http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/23/safety-and-security-in-automation.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com/feed-forward/2010/7/23/safety-and-security-in-automation.html"/><author><name>Gary Mintchell</name></author><published>2010-07-23T16:31:28Z</published><updated>2010-07-23T16:31:28Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>We're still getting more thoughts and information from the virus that hit a Siemens WinCC customer.&nbsp; When you add that to the continuing revelations coming from the BP Deepwater Horizon oil rig, and it's been a summer of safety and security.</p>
<p>I put both in the same sentence, because often safety problems and security problems stem from a common root cause--a pattern of risky behaviors by people. Sometimes there is lack of company policy. Sometimes lack of oversight. Sometimes just small decisions that don't appear by themselves to be risky but that when added to others create a pattern or environment of risk.</p>
<p>The attack on Siemens actually exploited a Microsoft Windows hole. But the hole only works if a person comes into possession of an infected USB stick--and inserts it into a PC that allows these devices to automatically boot and load into the PC. Either a risky behavior, or a security breech where an unauthorized person has access to a PC.</p>
<p>The problems in the Gulf appear also to have been the result of the build up of small decisions that cumulated into a large problem. Today in <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/24/us/24hearings.html">The New York Times</a></strong></em></span>, a worker alleges that the oil rig alarm was not fully turned on so that workers wouldn't be awakened.</p>
<p>Meanwhile <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9179564/Virus_writers_are_picking_up_new_Microsoft_attack">Computerworld</a></strong></em></span> (the source of my first learning of the Siemens virus) has followed up with more information about the worm.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20lesson.html">The New York Times</a></strong></em></span> also has an article discussing how we learn from disasters.</p>
<p>Eric Murphy at the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://blog.matrikonopc.com/index.php/on-siemens-scada-and-security/">OPC Exchange blog weighed in on security</a></strong></em></span>. He rightly points out that OPC itself has used part of its recent upgrade to enhance security.</p>
<p>While I'm on the subject of OPC, I'll point to <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em><strong><a href="http://lists.opcfoundation.org/TomsBlog/archive/2010/07/22/opc-foundation-certification-lab-annnouncment.aspx">Tom Burke's blog</a></strong></em></span> where he announces the OPC Foundation Certification Lab.</p>]]></content></entry></feed>